In either case Cheap Soccer Jerseys , there is a major question that you should be aware of as you write. We've already discussed a lot of the principles involved in writing, but this one is more direct as it pertains to the idea of getting your work accepted by the first people to usually see it and who have the most power in making your book happen or in stopping it.What are publishers, editors, and agents looking for in the materials they are reviewing? What do they like? What do they specifically dislike? What keeps them turning pages and beginning to get the feeling that "this might be good? I could get behind this."Here are many thoughts I've gleaned from talking with some of the above noted folks, reading their blogs and articles, and so on.One of the first things most of them say, in one way or another, is that they need to "fall in love with" the manuscript, the story. That means that they have to get personally into the story. It has to capture them, more than professionally (as an editor, for instance), but in a personal sense. From the first sentence (remember what I said early on about capturing them from the first words?), they need to feel good about the story. The writing itself may be as good or bad as many other books, but the imagination or feel or flow simply reaches out and grabs them. Maybe there's a sense of excitement or intrigue they feel. Maybe there's a driving force that is pushing to the end and keeps them reading.And if the agent or publisher you contact says "no thanks, it's not my style" (or words to that effect), then remember they are only one-move on to the next one. Someone out there is likely looking for just the type of material you've written.Consider books you're read yourself. What made you like them? What kept you turning the pages? Maybe it was a science fiction kind of book, and you don't like science fiction; but this one had a mystique or intrigue that kept you reading it. Maybe it was the theme; maybe the feeling that you never knew what was coming next and had to find out; maybe it was the beautiful flow of the words. The New International Bible and the New American Standard are acclaimed as excellent Bibles written in quite modern language; fewer of the "thees" and "thous" and much easier for a lot of people to read. However, many people simply love the beautiful poetic language of the old King James version, and just cannot get away from it. What is "capturing" about your book?As you think about the theme and direction and flow of your writing, ask yourself what people will like about it, especially those who will be the first to rule on it's success or failure. Freely compare your style, choice of words, and so on with several of the bestsellers. Does your book give you the same drive and feeling as the others do? (Remember what I said earlier about "copying" them?) One editor said, "Does it come alive to me?"Another thought: Does your story seem to have a theme that's real or alive? Can the reader see the world or the struggle or intrigue through your words. Many of the editors and publishers said that the writing from two authors was just about the same, just about as good, but one had a force, or choice of words, or painted a picture that the other didn't, and their mind was captured by that one.Is your story set in a time period, or does it tell a type of story, that the particular editor is interested in? That's why you might send your material out to a hundred different editors or agents and only get replies from six. Don't worry about that; not all readers are interested in the same thing. But, from the six, what kind of comments did you get? Were they interested; did they give any hints in their comments as to what they thought of the work; did they ask any questions as to what you were trying to do or what you meant? Even if it was a rejection letter, try to analyze anything they said that might give insight into how they or others might be feeling about your work.Is all this beginning to sound cold and analytical? If you really do have the desire to get your book out there into the reading hands, you do have to be analytical. If you can't get past first base (the agents and editors), Why? What can you learn from their responses that will help you write better and get them interested? Editors, agents and publishers simply cannot read everything, so they stick within their own specialized genre and they have to almost immediately get an attraction for your work. If they say No to what you've sent them, in that earthshaking REJECTION letter, do they give any hints as to their feelings? Do they send you any possible names that might be interested in your type of work? Do they make any suggestions as to how to change your work to make it more interesting?Once you've made your first effort to get your manuscript reviewed by a group of people, maybe it's time to sit back with any comments they've made and completely re read your book, or especially your query letter. Look back at your chapter outline and see if you can see where you might re place some chapters. See if any words, phrases, ideas, conversations and so on seem to be dull or out of place. Look at those first few sentences and paragraphs and pages to see if they are attention capturing or "sleepy time." Perhaps it's time to have a friend read the book (again?) and give an honest (you hope) appraisal of what they see. Maybe you can see a completely new f
